Cash Flow Frog logo

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

Table of Contents
1. What Is the Debt-to-Equity Ratio?2. How It's Calculated3. Worked Example4. Why It Matters in Practice5. How Debt-to-Equity Ratio Affects Your Cash Flow6. How You'd See This in Cash Flow Frog7. Related Terms

What Is the Debt-to-Equity Ratio?

The debt-to-equity ratio measures how much of a business is funded by debt relative to what the owners have put in or accumulated through retained earnings. It shows the proportion of creditor funding to owner funding, a higher ratio means more of the business's capital comes from borrowed money.

How It's Calculated

Debt-to-Equity Ratio = Total Liabilities / Total Equity

Total liabilities includes all debt the business carries: accounts payable, short-term loans, the current portion of long-term debt, long-term loans, finance leases, and any other obligations to creditors. Total equity is the owners' residual claim, paid-in capital plus retained earnings, minus any accumulated losses or distributions that have reduced the equity base.

Some versions of the ratio use only interest-bearing financial debt rather than total liabilities, excluding accounts payable and accrued expenses, which are operational rather than financial obligations. This narrower version is often called the financial debt-to-equity ratio and gives a cleaner picture of how much borrowed money the business is carrying specifically for funding purposes, separate from normal trading liabilities.

Both versions are legitimate. The choice depends on the purpose: lenders typically use the total liabilities version to assess the full claims on the business; financial analysts sometimes prefer the narrower version to isolate the financing structure from working capital movements. When comparing the ratio across businesses or periods, consistency in the definition used matters.

Worked Example

A regional logistics company has the following balance sheet at year-end:

Liabilities:

Item Amount (USD)
Accounts payable $148,000
Accrued expenses $42,000
Current portion of long-term loan $85,000
Long-term loan balance $620,000
Finance lease obligations $94,000
Total Liabilities $989,000

Equity:

Item Amount (USD)
Paid-in capital $200,000
Retained earnings $411,000
Total Equity $611,000

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (total liabilities): $989,000 / $611,000 = 1.62

For every dollar of equity, creditors have $1.62 of claims on the business. The business is more debt-funded than equity-funded, though not unusually so for a logistics company with significant vehicle and equipment financing.

Narrower version (financial debt only): ($85,000 + $620,000 + $94,000) / $611,000 = $799,000 / $611,000 = 1.31

Excluding trade payables and accruals, the financial debt load is $799,000, still materially above equity, but the picture is cleaner for assessing the financing structure specifically.

The difference between the two versions ($989,000 versus $799,000) is $190,000 in accounts payable and accrued expenses, normal trading liabilities that will cycle through as invoices are paid. Treating those as equivalent to long-term debt overstates the financing risk; excluding them gives a more accurate sense of what has been borrowed to fund the business's capital base.

Why It Matters in Practice

It tells lenders how much prior claim exists ahead of them

When a business seeks financing, lenders look at the existing debt-to-equity ratio to assess whether the current balance sheet can support more debt. A business with significant existing debt has creditors who already rank ahead of any new lender in a default scenario. The higher the ratio, the more diluted the lender's security. Many lenders set maximum ratio thresholds as part of their credit criteria, a business above those thresholds may be declined or offered different terms regardless of how profitable it is.

It tracks how the financing structure changes over time

A rising debt-to-equity ratio over several years means the business is taking on more debt faster than it is building equity through retained profits. That is not automatically a problem, a business investing in growth through debt may be making a rational decision, but the trend matters. A ratio that has moved from 1.0 to 2.5 over three years needs an explanation: was the debt taken on deliberately to fund specific assets? Has profitability fallen and eroded the equity base? Has the owner been drawing out retained earnings? The ratio is a symptom; the question is always what is causing the movement.

Covenant compliance depends on it

Loan agreements frequently include a maximum debt-to-equity covenant. If the ratio breaches the agreed ceiling, say, 3.0, the lender can declare a technical default, demand additional security, or require early repayment. A business operating close to a covenant threshold needs to monitor the ratio against any planned borrowing, acquisition, or distribution that would reduce equity. Breaching a covenant by surprise is an avoidable event for any business that tracks the ratio alongside its financial planning.

How Debt-to-Equity Ratio Affects Your Cash Flow

The ratio shows how much of the business is funded by debt. More debt means more fixed cash claims before owners see anything.

Those claims are the direct cash flow consequence. Every dollar of debt on the balance sheet comes with an associated repayment schedule, principal and interest payments that run on fixed dates, at fixed amounts, regardless of whether the trading month was strong or soft. A business with a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.62 has creditor funding exceeding equity funding, which means a substantial portion of each month's operating cash flow goes toward servicing those obligations before any discretionary allocation can be made. The forecast shows exactly how much: the financing outflows, loan repayments, lease payments, interest, appear as committed cash outflows on their scheduled dates, and what remains after them is what the owner and the business can actually allocate.

This is the practical reason the debt-to-equity ratio and the cash flow forecast need to be read together. The ratio describes the structural position at a point in time, how the business has been funded. The forecast describes the timing consequence of that structure, when the cash commitments arrive and whether operating inflows are sufficient to cover them. A business with a manageable ratio can still face quarters where debt service and a seasonal revenue dip combine to create a cash gap. Seeing that in the forecast before it happens is the difference between planning a response and reacting to a shortfall.

How You'd See This in Cash Flow Frog

Cash Flow Frog connects to QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Desktop, Xero, Sage Intacct, Odoo, Zoho Books, and FreshBooks and builds a rolling cash flow forecast automatically from your accounting data. QuickBooks records what happened. Cash Flow Frog projects what is coming.

Loan repayments and finance lease obligations recorded in the accounting system appear as projected financing outflows in the forecast at their scheduled payment dates. The forecast extends up to three years out, which means a full loan repayment schedule is visible across the entire remaining term, not just the next quarter. For businesses with debt across multiple entities or currencies, the repayment picture consolidates natively without a separate reconciliation step. If you want to trace a specific loan payment affecting the projected balance in a particular month, the tool drills down to the transaction level. For a broader look at how debt financing affects the business's capital structure and cash obligations, the related entry at cashflowfrog.com/glossary/debt-financing/ covers that in detail.

Back to Glossary Page

FAQ

It depends heavily on the industry and the type of assets the business holds. Capital-intensive businesses, logistics, manufacturing, construction, routinely carry ratios above 1.5 because equipment and property provide asset backing for the debt. Service businesses with minimal physical assets typically carry lower ratios because there is less collateral to support borrowing. As a general orientation, a ratio below 1.0 is considered conservative, and most lenders become more cautious as the ratio approaches or exceeds 2.0 to 3.0, though sector norms vary. The most useful benchmark is the trend in the ratio over time and how it compares to covenant thresholds in existing loan agreements.

No. Many financially healthy businesses carry high ratios because debt is an efficient way to fund capital-intensive growth, particularly when interest rates are low relative to the return the assets generate. A property development business or a fleet logistics company may sustain a ratio above 2.0 comfortably, provided the assets are productive and the cash flow from operations covers debt service with headroom. The ratio is concerning when it is rising faster than equity is being built, when interest coverage is thin, or when the debt is funding operating losses rather than productive assets.

Debt-to-equity compares liabilities to the equity base: how many dollars of debt exist for every dollar of owner funding. Debt-to-assets compares liabilities to total assets: what proportion of the asset base is debt-funded. The two are mathematically related, a higher debt-to-equity ratio always corresponds to a higher debt-to-assets ratio for the same balance sheet, but they express the relationship differently. Debt-to-equity is more intuitive for thinking about the owner's position relative to creditors; debt-to-assets is more useful for assessing overall leverage against the asset base.

Owner drawings or dividends reduce retained earnings, which reduces equity. Reducing equity with the same debt load increases the debt-to-equity ratio. A business where the owner regularly draws out a large portion of profits is building the ratio upward even if the business is trading profitably, because the equity base never accumulates to offset the debt. This is worth understanding when the ratio trends upward without any new borrowing, the issue may be distributions rather than debt growth, which calls for a different response.

Yes, by increasing equity. Retaining more profit rather than distributing it builds retained earnings and improves the ratio without touching the debt side. An equity injection from the owner or a new investor also improves it directly. In practice, both routes are slower than they appear, it takes meaningful retained profit to move the ratio materially when the debt base is large. Repaying debt is usually the faster route to ratio improvement, and the two approaches are often combined.

Because accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other short-term operational liabilities behave differently from borrowed money. They cycle through the business as part of normal trading, a payables balance that turns over every 30 days is not the same kind of financial risk as a five-year term loan. Using total liabilities includes those operational balances, which can make the ratio look more indebted than the financing structure actually is. Lenders often strip out operational liabilities and focus on financial debt, bank loans, finance leases, bonds, when assessing the capital structure specifically.

Looking for more help?

Visit our help center to find answers to your questions about CashFlowFrog.

Help Centre

Trusted by thousands of business owners

Start Free Trial Now